by Aug 12, 2016.
, Huffington Post,
…For most traditional publishers, selling 5,000 books is considered a success. You can even get on the Wall Street Journal bestseller list with as little as 3,000 book sales and strangely on the New York Times bestseller list with as little as 2,000 book sales. Unfortunately, most authors do not sell more than 500 books.
Although, how much money would an author earn from selling 5,000 copies in a year?
Living on a $6,000/year salary would classify you as poor in developed countries.
How about earning a $30,000/year salary as an author? Well, with a traditional publisher, you would need to sell 25,000 books.
How about $60,000/year salary? You would need to sell 50,000 books.
These findings may startle you, but it is the unfortunate reality.
Moreover, this is why I strongly believe this Generation Y era marks the beginning of the end for traditional book publishers.
These publishers are getting desperate because their exploitative tactics are not working as effectively as they did in the past.
It is no surprise why they are offering six to seven figure book deals to bestselling self-published authors.
Traditional publishers are so desperate that they are trying just about anything to stay relevant and in business.
For several years, Penguin-Random House owned Author Solutions, the parent company of many self-publishing companies and imprints.
Perhaps, you may have a book or considered signing with one of the following:
- Archway Publishing (Simon & Schuster)
- Westbow Press (Thomas Nelson)
- Balboa Press (Hay House)
- Abbott Press (Writer’s Digest)
I am almost certain that you are familiar with one or more of those self-publishing companies or imprints. Can you now see the eagerness and involvement of traditional publishers in this alternative arena?
Harper Collins recently launched an imprint to attract indie authors. Their new imprint, Harper Legend, is seeking fiction manuscripts from eBook authors about topics related to spirituality, self-help, and fantasy.
Several months ago, Hachette entered a binding agreement to buy Perseus Books (an indie publisher with 10 imprints).
Although, Penguin-Random House recently stepped away from the self-publishing arena with the sale of Author Solutions several months ago.
Is Penguin-Random House convinced that they can thrive without having an indie or self-publishing imprint? Or will they (at least) grant favorable contract terms that are more reflective to indie publishers’ contracts? We will find out eventually.
The definition of a traditional publisher will definitely change within the next 15 years. This is indeed a good thing, especially for authors.
In today’s era, a traditional publisher cannot do much for you. Moreover, they probably will not do much for you unless you are a big name like J.K. Rowling or Jack Canfield.
So, why give more of your profits to a publisher who will not do much for you?
Most traditional publishers have excellent international distribution. Although, what if the majority of your sales were based in the United States?
You would not need a publisher to establish contractual agreements with Amazon, Kobo, iBooks, Ingram, or indie bookstores. All of these outlets work with self-published authors.
Besides international distribution, I invite people to explain why traditional publishers would still be the best choice. The credibility argument is dying nowadays. Publishing with Penguin-Random House may give you credibility, but it will not necessarily give you as much credibility as your competition.
If a self-published author sells 30,000 books and you (as a traditionally published author) sold 5,000 books, who is more credible in the public domain? The fans are voting in the form of book sales.
By 2030, traditional publishers will die or be predominantly run by imprints that favor indie and self-published authors.