(from one of my recent syllabi)
Your grading policy for your course is dependent on your school and program. Your grading policies can be found in the IWU Catalog.
In most workshops, there are discussion forums. These discussions focus on either a special topic or general material from the workshop. You will be given instructions on which discussion forums apply to the current workshop. Complete discussions individually or in study groups as instructed. Well-thought-out postings that add something intellectually to the discussion are required for a good grade. Your initial postings should fully answer the questions posed in the course interface. Additionally, you must reply to at least two of your classmate’s postings. Postings of the “I agree” or “Me too” variety will not suffice.
In these weekly discussions conduct some outside reading in a minimum of two to three books to support your observations. This might include a Bible commentary, other books on this topic, etc. Customarily the graduate school student is expected to be skimming a minimum of several outside books each week and bring them into, when helpful, the online conversation. Also bring into the conversation relevant ideas from your other course textbooks. Thus, each week the student should be bringing into the online conversation one to two textbooks and two to three outside references as a minimum.
Also be sure to reply to any followup questions posted by your instructor. These are designed to help you dig deeper into application and theory.
Most weeks an end-of-week paper will be due by Thursday 11:59pm. Like your discussions these end-of-week papers should cite relevant outside readings which support your observations. Similar to the discussion parameters, the graduate school student is expected at a minimum to be skimming several outside books each week and bringing them to bear upon their weekly papers (with citations). Also, don’t forget to bring into your papers relevant ideas from other course textbooks.
And, unless specified differently by your professor, your end-of-week papers should comply with APA formatting rules and include an abstract.
An Expectation of Outside Scholarship
Therefore for B level work, the student should each week be utilizing and citing in their weekly papers and discussion forums, one to two textbooks and two to three outside references. Remember however, this is for B level work. A person seeking a higher grade would be expected to do better.
Letter Grade Equivalencies
Description of Work
Clearly stands out as excellent performance. Has unusually sharp insights into material and initiates thoughtful questions. Sees many sides of an issue. Articulates well and writes logically and clearly. Integrates ideas previously learned from this and other disciplines. Anticipates next steps in progression of ideas. Example “A” work should be of such nature that it could be put on reserve for all cohort members to review and emulate. The “A” cohort member is, in fact, an example for others to follow. Typical interaction will be 3+ times in each forum.
Demonstrates a solid comprehension of the subject matter and always accomplishes all course requirements. Serves as an active participant and listener. Communicates orally and in writing at an acceptable level for the degree program. Work shows intuition and creativity. Example “B” work indicates good quality of performance and is given in recognition for solid work; a “B” should be considered a good grade and awarded to those who submit assignments of quality less than the exemplary work described above. Typical interaction will be 3+ times in each forum.
Quality and quantity of work in and out of class is average. Has marginal comprehension, communication skills, or initiative. Requirements of the assignments are addressed at least minimally. Typical interaction will be 3 or fewer times in each forum.
Quality and quantity of work is below average. Has minimal comprehension, communication skills, or initiative. Requirements of the assignments are addressed at below acceptable levels. Typical interaction will be two or fewer times in each forum.
Quality and quantity of work is unacceptable and does not qualify the student to progress to a more advanced level of work.